Claims

Supporting evidence is unevenly distributed across the eight clinical teaching models, with OMP and SNAPPS the most extensively studied

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? OMP appears in 16 of 26 included articles and SNAPPS in 6 of 26, while STEPS, RIME, Aunt Minnie, BOPPPS, ED STAT, and MiPLAN each appear in only one article. → Munguiko Clement 2026

Evidence

Munguiko Clement 2026

Munguiko Clement, Masereka Enos Mirembe, Atukwatse Joseph, Smitha Joseph, Kateregga James, Nankinga Clare, Collete Alice Alum, Namujju Josephine, Akello Safina, Nalubega Sylivia. (2026). Clinical teaching models for the instruction of healthcare trainees in the 21st century: a scoping review. BMC Medical Education. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-026-09710-w

q2 · i? · review · r2

Descriptive frequency analysis of the 26 included articles in the scoping review. The review reports "OMP (n = 16/26) and SNAPPS (n = 6/26) being the most extensively studied" while the remaining six models each appeared in one article; two articles reported more than one model.

"OMP (n = 16/26) and SNAPPS (n = 6/26) being the most extensively studied compared to models such as STEPS (n = 1/26), RIME (n = 1/26)"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.