Claims

Constructivist learning models show high-level effects on thinking skills (ES=.88) and academic success (ES=.81) but a medium-level effect on attitudes (ES=.51)

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r3 · q3
Currency · newest study 2022 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? The effect of constructivist learning models statistically varies by student outcome type (Qb(2)=6.32, p=.04), with high effects on thinking skills and achievement and a medium effect on attitude. → Demir 2022

Evidence

Demir 2022

Demir, M., & Kaya, M. (2022). Analysis of constructivist learning model's effects on student outcomes: A second order meta-analysis. Journal of Theoretical Educational Science, 15(4), 938-957. http://doi.org/10.30831/akukeg.1122136

q3 · i? · quant-synthesis · r3

Q-between moderator analysis of the 21 effect sizes grouped by outcome type (achievement k=14, attitude k=3, thinking skill k=4) under a random effect model. The article reports "Qb(2) = 6.32, p=.04" and the per-outcome effect sizes ES=.88, ES=.81 and ES=.51.

"CLM's impact statistically varies according to student outcome types (Qb(2) = 6.32, p=.04). While CLM has a high impact on students' thi nking skills and academic s ( ES=.88, ES=.81 respectively), its impact on student attitudes is ( ES=.51) medium -level."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.