Flipped classrooms in higher education show a medium overall positive effect on student outcomes compared with traditional lecture-based classrooms¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesisr2·q3·i1small
Currency · newest study 2020 · checked against its sources 2026-10-31 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i1 Across 43 studies, the random effects model estimated an overall effect size of ES = 0.35 (95% CI 0.24 to 0.47), a small-to-medium effect favouring flipped classrooms. → Hwan Young Jang and Hye Jeong Kim 2020
Evidence¶
Hwan Young Jang and Hye Jeong Kim 2020¶
Hwan Young Jang and Hye Jeong Kim. (2020). A Meta-Analysis of the Cognitive, Affective, and Interpersonal Outcomes of Flipped Classrooms in Higher Education. Educ. Sci. 2020, 10, 115. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10040115
q3 · i1 · quant-synthesis · r2
Random effects meta-analysis of 43 empirical studies of flipped classrooms in higher education published 2012–2017. The overall effect size was ES = 0.35 (95% CI = 0.24 to 0.47), described as "a medium effect in terms of the Cohen’s rule of thumb". Effect sizes were heterogeneous (Q[42] = 1022.9, p < 0.05, I2 = 96.0), justifying the random effects model.
"The overall effect size of flipped classrooms was 0.35, indicating that flipped classrooms had a medium effect in terms of the Cohen’s rule of thumb [68]."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Flipped classroom effects are larger on affective and interpersonal outcomes than on cognitive outcomes — related
- In a low-certainty meta-analysis of 44 studies with very high heterogeneity (I² = 98%), undergraduate health professional students in flipped classes score higher than those in traditional classes (SMD = 0.57) — possibly the same claim (merge candidate)
- Context-based learning has a statistically significant positive overall effect on academic achievement (g=0.970) compared to traditional lecture-based instruction — related
- Context-based learning has a statistically significant positive overall effect on learning retention (g=0.791) compared to traditional lecture-based instruction — related
- The constructivist approach produces more positive attitudes towards lessons than traditional teaching, with an overall effect size of 0.728 across 43 Turkish studies — related
- Cooperative learning produces a medium, positive, significant effect on mathematics achievement compared with traditional methods (d++ = 0.59) — related
- The constructivist learning approach has a strong positive overall effect on students' academic achievement compared to traditional teaching methods (ES = 1.156). — related
- Small-group learning methods produce a moderate positive overall effect on college students' achievement in undergraduate engineering and technology classrooms compared with lecture-based and individualized instruction — related
- Constructivist learning models show high-level effects on thinking skills (ES=.88) and academic success (ES=.81) but a medium-level effect on attitudes (ES=.51) — related
- Within the cognitive domain, flipped classrooms show the largest effects on understanding and achievement and a negative effect on evaluation — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.