Claims

The constructivist approach produces more positive attitudes towards lessons than traditional teaching, with an overall effect size of 0.728 across 43 Turkish studies

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r2 · q3 · i2 medium
Currency · newest study 2016 · checked against its sources 2026-10-31 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i2 Across 43 studies analyzed with a random effects model, students taught with the constructivist approach held more positive attitudes towards lessons than students taught by traditional methods (ES = 0.728, Z = 5.115, p < .05). → Toraman 2016

Evidence

Toraman 2016

Toraman, C., & Demir, E. (2016). The effect of constructivism on attitudes towards lessons: A meta–analysis study. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 62, 115-142. http://dx.doi.org/10.14689/ejer.2016.62.8

q3 · i2 · quant-synthesis · r2

Meta-analysis of 43 studies (28 theses, 15 articles) conducted in Turkey between 2004 and 2015, with N = 1,529 experimental and N = 1,539 control participants, analyzed in CMA software under the random effect model. The printed effect size is ES = 0.728 (Z = 5.115, p < .05); the article reports "the value of the average effect size was found to be 0,728 and positive", favouring the experimental group.

"When the results of our study were analyzed according the random effect model, the effect size was found to be significant with a confidence interval of 95% (Z = 5,115, p<.05). The value of the average effect size was found to be 0,728 and positive."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.