Experts judged the contextual mathematical thinking learning model valid, with an average evaluation score of 4.23¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · design r2 · q1
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q1 i? Three experts rated the model's components (content and construct validity, rational model, theories, syntax, social system, reaction principle, instructional impact, accompanist impact) as valid, with an average score of 4.23. → Damianus D. Samo 2017

Evidence¶

Damianus D. Samo 2017¶

Damianus D. Samo, Darhim & Bana Kartasasmita. (2017). Developing Contextual Mathematical Thinking Learning Model to Enhance Higher-Order Thinking Ability for Middle School Students. International Education Studies, 10(12). https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v10n12p17

q1 · i? · design · r2

Expert validation in the model development phase using validation sheets rated on a 1-5 scale (Table 1 shows component scores of 4-5 and an average of 4.23). The article states the final model "confirms the validity criterion" of strong theoretical rationale and internal consistency.

"The result of the validation was revised and it became the final model. The final model confirms the validity criterion which the model developed based on strong theoretical rationale and internal consistency."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Observed implementation of the model was practical: learning-activity elements averaged in the good category and 85.7% of students responded positively — related
• The TEFA-T model and its supporting products are rated Very Practical by instructors and students — related