Observed implementation of the model was practical: learning-activity elements averaged in the good category and 85.7% of students responded positively¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · causal r1 · q1
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q1 i? Observer ratings of the three main learning-model elements fell in the good category: syntax averaged 3.5, social system 3.52, and reaction principle 3.47. → Damianus D. Samo 2017 q1 i? Students' activity averaged 3.56 (good category) and 85.7% of students responded positively to the model. → Damianus D. Samo 2017 (2)

Evidence¶

Damianus D. Samo 2017¶

Damianus D. Samo, Darhim & Bana Kartasasmita. (2017). Developing Contextual Mathematical Thinking Learning Model to Enhance Higher-Order Thinking Ability for Middle School Students. International Education Studies, 10(12). https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v10n12p17

q1 · i? · causal · r1

Observation of learning activities during the implementation phase, rated on the model's main elements. The article reports "Syntax has an average 3.5, social system has an average 3.52, and reaction principle has an average 3.47".

"The three main elements were observed by the observer and have an average in the good category. Syntax has an average 3.5, social system has an average 3.52, and reaction principle has an average 3.47."

Damianus D. Samo 2017 (2)¶

Damianus D. Samo, Darhim & Bana Kartasasmita. (2017). Developing Contextual Mathematical Thinking Learning Model to Enhance Higher-Order Thinking Ability for Middle School Students. International Education Studies, 10(12). https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v10n12p17

q1 · i? · design · r2

Observation of students' activities and a student response questionnaire during implementation. Student activity averaged 3.56 and "the result of the students’ responses who have responded positively to the contextual mathematical thinking learning model was 85.7%".

"The result of the students’ activities observations in each learning activity is 3.56, so it can be concluded that the students’ activity in contextual mathematical thinking learning model is in a good category."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Experts judged the contextual mathematical thinking learning model valid, with an average evaluation score of 4.23 — related
• The TEFA-T model and its supporting products are rated Very Practical by instructors and students — related