Cognitive flexibility uniquely predicts literacy achievement in Grades 4 and 6, above and beyond fluid intelligence, attention, inhibitory control, working memory, and planning¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2020 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? In Grade 6, adding cognitive flexibility significantly increased explained variance in literacy achievement (ΔR² = .04), with flexibility a significant unique predictor (b = .24). → Sofia Magalhães 2020
Evidence¶
Sofia Magalhães 2020¶
Sofia Magalhães, Luísa Carneiro, Teresa Limpo & Marisa Filipe (2020). Executive functions predict literacy and mathematics achievements: The unique contribution of cognitive flexibility in grades 2, 4, and 6. Child Neuropsychology, 26(7), 934-952. https://doi.org/10.1080/09297049.2020.1740188
q2 · i? · associational · r2
Two-step hierarchical regression with 203 sixth graders predicting teacher-assigned Portuguese literacy marks; Step 2 added cognitive flexibility, yielding "ΔR2 = .04, Fchange(1, 196) = 10.88, p = .001" and b = .24.
"the introduction of cognitive flexibility on Step 2 resulted in signi ficant increase in the amount of explained variance in literacy achievement, ΔR2 = .04, Fchange(1, 196) = 10.88, p = .001. Again, cognitive flexibility was found to have a signi ficant and unique contribution"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Executive function measures predict early mathematics achievement over and above reading ability and IQ — related
- Snippet selection contributes to integration quality over and above reading fluency and reading comprehension — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
- ASD shows a distinct executive dysfunction profile of impaired cognitive flexibility and planning with intact inhibitory control
- Cognitive flexibility uniquely predicts mathematics achievement in Grades 4 and 6, with a larger effect in Grade 6 than in Grade 4 — related
- Cognitive flexibility does not add unique explained variance to literacy or mathematics achievement in Grade 2 — related
- The set of executive-function and intelligence predictors of academic achievement differs across Grades 2, 4, and 6, with EF contributions appearing cumulative as students get older — related
- Working memory and inhibition both contribute to spontaneous flexibility, whereas only inhibition contributes to reactive flexibility — related
- Executive functions, especially working memory, inhibition, and cognitive flexibility, are consistently associated with core SRL activities — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
cognitive-flexibility-unique-predictor-literacy-grades-4-6 |
title |
Cognitive flexibility uniquely predicts literacy achievement in Grades 4 and 6, above and beyond fluid intelligence, attention, inhibitory control, working memory, and planning |
description |
Cognitive flexibility uniquely predicts literacy achievement in Grades 4 and 6, above and beyond fluid intelligence, attention, inhibitory control, working memory, and planning |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2020 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-16 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — sofia-magalhães-2020 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.