N-back response time increases and accuracy decreases with cognitive load, and Posner cue conditions differ in speed and accuracy trade-offs¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr2·q3
Currency · newest study 2020 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? Response time rose and accuracy fell from 1-back to 3-back (all p < 0.05); on the attention task, the no cue condition was slowest but most accurate, valid cues fastest, and invalid cues least accurate. → Stefansdottir 2020
Evidence¶
Stefansdottir 2020¶
Stefansdottir, R., Gundersen, H., Rognvaldsdottir, V., Lundervold, A. S., Gestsdottir, S., Gudmundsdottir, S. L., Chen, K. Y., Brychta, R. J. & Johannsson, E. (2020). Association between free-living sleep and memory and attention in healthy adolescents. Scientific Reports 10:16877. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-73774-x
q3 · i? · associational · r2
Mixed-effect regression with Bonferroni post hoc correction across 160 adolescents; on the attention task "The no cue presentation elicited the slowest but most accurate responses" (all p < 0.001 across conditions).
"Response time and accuracy varied predictably across cognitive load: response time gradually increased while accuracy decreased in a dose–response manner from the 1-back to the 2-back and 3-back conditions (all p < 0.05)"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Reaction times differ significantly across all three cue conditions, with fastest RT for valid cues and slowest for no-cue stimuli — related
- A significant main effect of stimuli category exists on reaction time in the Posner cue task — related
- Reaction times are faster during threat than safe conditions only on the high-load (3-back) task, in both adolescents and adults — related
- Working memory load degrades discrimination accuracy and slows responses in youth — possibly the same claim (merge candidate)
- Free-living sleep measures show no association with visual attention task performance in older adolescents — related
- Threat of an aversive scream lowers verbal working memory accuracy at low and medium load but not at high load in both adolescents and adults — related
- Higher cardiorespiratory fitness is associated with faster reaction times for stimuli following valid cues in healthy male high-school students — related
- With increasing n-back task difficulty, reaction times increase and accuracy decreases — possibly the same claim (merge candidate)
- Neither muscle mass nor weekly training frequency is associated with reaction time across cue conditions in healthy male high-school students — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
cognitive-load-dose-response-nback-posner |
title |
N-back response time increases and accuracy decreases with cognitive load, and Posner cue conditions differ in speed and accuracy trade-offs |
description |
N-back response time increases and accuracy decreases with cognitive load, and Posner cue conditions differ in speed and accuracy trade-offs |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2020 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-17 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — stefansdottir-2020 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.