Reaction times differ significantly across all three cue conditions, with fastest RT for valid cues and slowest for no-cue stimuli¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Post hoc analyses with Bonferroni correction showed significant differences between all stimuli categories, with RT to invalid cues slower than valid cues and faster than no cue. → Wengaard E 2017
Evidence¶
Wengaard E 2017¶
Wengaard E, Kristoffersen M, Harris A and Gundersen H (2017) Cardiorespiratory Fitness Is Associated with Selective Attention in Healthy Male High-School Students. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 11:330. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2017.00330
q2 · i? · associational · r2
Post hoc Bonferroni-corrected comparisons of reaction times across the three stimuli categories in the Posner cue task (n = 54). The article reports "RT to stimuli following invalid cues were slower compared to valid cue (Mean differences = 59.94, SE = 2.81, p < 0.001) and faster compared to stimuli following no cue (Mean differences = −23.16, SE = 2.13, p < 0.001)".
"RT to stimuli following invalid cues were slower compared to valid cue (Mean differences = 59.94, SE = 2.81, p < 0.001) and faster compared to stimuli following no cue (Mean differences = −23.16, SE = 2.13, p < 0.001)."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- N-back response time increases and accuracy decreases with cognitive load, and Posner cue conditions differ in speed and accuracy trade-offs — related
- A significant main effect of stimuli category exists on reaction time in the Posner cue task — a broader claim this one bears on
- Higher cardiorespiratory fitness is associated with faster reaction times for stimuli following valid cues in healthy male high-school students — related
- Higher cardiorespiratory fitness is associated with faster reaction times for stimuli following invalid cues in healthy male high-school students — related
- Cardiorespiratory fitness is not associated with reaction times for uncued stimuli in healthy male high-school students — related
- Neither muscle mass nor weekly training frequency is associated with reaction time across cue conditions in healthy male high-school students — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
rt-differs-across-cue-conditions |
title |
Reaction times differ significantly across all three cue conditions, with fastest RT for valid cues and slowest for no-cue stimuli |
description |
Reaction times differ significantly across all three cue conditions, with fastest RT for valid cues and slowest for no-cue stimuli |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2017 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-17 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — wengaard-e-2017 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.