Claims

A significant main effect of stimuli category exists on reaction time in the Posner cue task

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? A significant main effect of stimuli (F = 6.01, p = 0.003) was found on reaction time across the three cue conditions. → Wengaard E 2017

Evidence

Wengaard E 2017

Wengaard E, Kristoffersen M, Harris A and Gundersen H (2017) Cardiorespiratory Fitness Is Associated with Selective Attention in Healthy Male High-School Students. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 11:330. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2017.00330

q2 · i? · associational · r2

Linear mixed model omnibus test of the main effect of stimuli category (no cue, valid cue, invalid cue) on reaction times in the Posner cue task (n = 54). The article reports "A significant main effect of stimuli ( F = 6.01, p = 0.003) was found".

"A significant main effect of stimuli ( F = 6.01, p = 0.003) was found."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id main-effect-stimuli-category-rt
title A significant main effect of stimuli category exists on reaction time in the Posner cue task
description A significant main effect of stimuli category exists on reaction time in the Posner cue task
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2017
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-17
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — wengaard-e-2017

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.