Claims

Cognitive presence was positively related to learning engagement and mediated relationships of teaching presence (full) and self-regulation (partial) with engagement

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r2 · q2 · i3 large
Currency · newest study 2023 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i3 Cognitive presence positively predicted learning engagement (β = 0.592, p < 0.001), fully mediating teaching presence effects and partially mediating self-regulation effects. → Doo 2023

Evidence

Doo 2023

Doo, M. Y., Bonk, C. J., & Heo, H. (2023). Examinations of the relationships between self-efficacy, self-regulation, teaching, cognitive presences, and learning engagement during COVID-19. Education Tech Research Dev. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-023-10187-3

q2 · i3 · associational · r2

SEM results from 1435 undergraduates supported H9 with "β = 0.592, t = 12.705, p < 0.001". The authors report full mediation for teaching presence and partial mediation for self-regulation through cognitive presence.

"Finally, the positive relationship between cognitive presence and learning engagement was found (β = 0.592, t = 12.705, p < 0.001); thus, H9 was supported."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-28
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.