Post-test scores were significantly higher for the combined-method group than the lecture-only group¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? The experimental group's post-test mean (7.95) was significantly greater than the control group's (6.43), t = 2.889, DF 38. → Kolesnikova 2016

Evidence¶

Kolesnikova 2016¶

Iryna V. Kolesnikova. (2016). Combined Teaching Method: An Experimental Study. World Journal of Education, 6(6). https://doi.org/10.5430/wje.v6n6p51

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Independent-samples t-test of overall post-test scores (N = 20 per group) reported in Table 6: experimental mean 7.95 (SD 1.953), control mean 6.43 (SD 1.310), t-value 2.889, DF 38; the text reports the difference significant at "P = 0.006 < 0.05". No effect size is printed.

"the mean score of the experimental and control groups were 7.95 and 6.43 respectively, considered greater in experimental group."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Combining analogy-based simulation with laboratory activities produces significantly higher corrected post-test achievement in simple electricity than either environment alone — related
• The traditional lecture-only method's pre-to-post gain was small and its significance is inconsistently reported — related
• Undergraduate students taught organic chemistry with an analogy instructional strategy achieved significantly higher post-test scores than students taught by traditional lecture methods — related
• Only the combined condition outperformed the control condition on a test of chemistry knowledge — related