Most studies (60.7%) of arthroscopic skills training combined objective metrics with subjective assessment scales¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2022 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q3 i? 60.7% of included studies used objective metrics together with subjective assessment scales when evaluating arthroscopic skill training. → Zhou Haixia 2022

Evidence¶

Zhou Haixia 2022¶

Zhou Haixia, Xian Chengyao, Zhang Kai-Jun, Yang Zhouwen, Li Wei, Tian Jing. (2022). The frequency of assessment tools in arthroscopic training: a systematic review. Annals of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1080/07853890.2022.2085317

q3 · i? · review · r2

Context analysis of assessment tool use across the 28 included studies, tabulated by testing context in Table 4. The review reports the combined-use proportion as "most of studies (60.7%)".

"In addition, most of studies (60.7%) combined objective metrics with subjective assessment scales in evaluation of arthroscopic skill training."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Objective metrics are used more frequently in simulated environments, while GRS and checklists are used with actual patients — related
• Objective assessment tools were used in 49% of robotic training studies, subjective forms in 23%, and 28% used both — related
• Completion time is the most common objective metric in arthroscopic skills training assessment, reported in 21 of 28 reviewed studies — related