Indigenous STEM students endorse communal goals more strongly than agentic goals, but perceive similar levels of communal and agentic affordances in STEM¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr2·q2·i2medium
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i2 Participants endorsed communal goals significantly more than agentic goals (d = 0.50), with no significant difference between perceived communal and agentic affordances. → Yu Fanyi 2025
Evidence¶
Yu Fanyi 2025¶
Yu Fanyi, Nyanamba Juliet M., Anderson Brittany, DeerInWater Kathy, Estrada Mica, Hosoda K. Kanoho, Maldonado Natalia, Smith Tiffany, Flores Lilibeth, & Hernandez Paul R. (2025). Navigating Science Pathways: Belonging Mediates the Impact of Goal Congruity on Persistence (but Not Life Satisfaction) Among Indigenous Students. Journal of Educational Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000967
q2 · i2 · associational · r2
Preliminary paired-sample t-tests in the longitudinal study comparing communal and agentic goal endorsement and affordance perceptions. The article prints "d = 0.50" for the endorsement difference and "d = 0.15" for the non-significant affordance difference.
"Results showed that Indigenous students endorsed communal goals more strongly than agentic goals (t[141] = 5.93, p < .001, d = 0.50). However, no significant difference was found between perceptions of communal and agentic affordances in STEM fields (t[141] = 1.80, p = .07, d = 0.15)."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Perceived communal goal affordances in STEM roles positively predict later persistence intentions among Indigenous STEM students, controlling for baseline — related
- No significant gender differences in communal or agentic goal affordances, endorsements, or incongruity among Indigenous STEM students — related
- Agentic goal incongruity negatively predicts Indigenous students' persistence intentions indirectly through reduced sense of belonging — related
- Goal affordances, goal incongruity, and belonging show no association with global life satisfaction among Indigenous STEM students — related
- Communal goal incongruity shows a significant negative indirect effect on persistence intentions through belonging, though weaker than expected — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
communal-endorsement-exceeds-agentic |
title |
Indigenous STEM students endorse communal goals more strongly than agentic goals, but perceive similar levels of communal and agentic affordances in STEM |
description |
Indigenous STEM students endorse communal goals more strongly than agentic goals, but perceive similar levels of communal and agentic affordances in STEM |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2025 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-24 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — yu-fanyi-2025 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.