Communal goal incongruity shows a significant negative indirect effect on persistence intentions through belonging, though weaker than expected¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Communal goal incongruity (affordance–endorsement difference) indirectly reduces persistence intentions via belonging, with 13.5% of its effect mediated. → Yu Fanyi 2025
Evidence¶
Yu Fanyi 2025¶
Yu Fanyi, Nyanamba Juliet M., Anderson Brittany, DeerInWater Kathy, Estrada Mica, Hosoda K. Kanoho, Maldonado Natalia, Smith Tiffany, Flores Lilibeth, & Hernandez Paul R. (2025). Navigating Science Pathways: Belonging Mediates the Impact of Goal Congruity on Persistence (but Not Life Satisfaction) Among Indigenous Students. Journal of Educational Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000967
q2 · i? · associational · r2
Bootstrapped mediation analysis in the same longitudinal model (N = 127). The article reports that "13.5% of the effect of communal incongruity" was mediated through belonging; the printed proportions are descriptive mediation percentages, not standardized effect sizes.
"Further, 13.5% of the effect of communal incongruity and 13.8% of the effect of agentic incongruity on persistence intentions was mediated through belonging."
Discussion¶
Learner Variables¶
- Belonging — predictor: learners who differ on it differ in outcomes
Related Claims¶
- Agentic goal incongruity negatively predicts Indigenous students' persistence intentions indirectly through reduced sense of belonging — related
- Perceived communal goal affordances in STEM roles positively predict later persistence intentions among Indigenous STEM students, controlling for baseline — related
- Indigenous STEM students endorse communal goals more strongly than agentic goals, but perceive similar levels of communal and agentic affordances in STEM — related
- Goal affordances, goal incongruity, and belonging show no association with global life satisfaction among Indigenous STEM students — related
- No significant gender differences in communal or agentic goal affordances, endorsements, or incongruity among Indigenous STEM students — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
communal-incongruity-indirect-effect |
title |
Communal goal incongruity shows a significant negative indirect effect on persistence intentions through belonging, though weaker than expected |
description |
Communal goal incongruity shows a significant negative indirect effect on persistence intentions through belonging, though weaker than expected |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
weak |
newest_evidence |
2025 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-24 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — yu-fanyi-2025 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.