No significant gender differences in communal or agentic goal affordances, endorsements, or incongruity among Indigenous STEM students¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Men and women in the sample did not differ in goal endorsement, affordance perceptions, or incongruity. → Yu Fanyi 2025
Evidence¶
Yu Fanyi 2025¶
Yu Fanyi, Nyanamba Juliet M., Anderson Brittany, DeerInWater Kathy, Estrada Mica, Hosoda K. Kanoho, Maldonado Natalia, Smith Tiffany, Flores Lilibeth, & Hernandez Paul R. (2025). Navigating Science Pathways: Belonging Mediates the Impact of Goal Congruity on Persistence (but Not Life Satisfaction) Among Indigenous Students. Journal of Educational Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000967
q2 · i? · associational · r2
Preliminary analyses of the longitudinal sample (59.7% women) examined gender differences in goal affordances, endorsements, and incongruity (Supplemental Table 1). The article reports no significant differences; no effect sizes are printed and equivalence was not tested.
"Moreover, there were no significant gender differences in communal/agentic affordances and endorsements, suggesting that men and women did not endorse different goals or perceive the opportunities afforded by STEM roles dissimilarly"
Discussion¶
Learner Variables¶
- Gender — predictor: outcomes differ by group: a gap reflecting circumstances and treatment, not a cause
Related Claims¶
- Indigenous STEM students endorse communal goals more strongly than agentic goals, but perceive similar levels of communal and agentic affordances in STEM — related
- Goal affordances, goal incongruity, and belonging show no association with global life satisfaction among Indigenous STEM students — related
- Agentic goal incongruity negatively predicts Indigenous students' persistence intentions indirectly through reduced sense of belonging — related
- Perceived communal goal affordances in STEM roles positively predict later persistence intentions among Indigenous STEM students, controlling for baseline — related
- Communal goal incongruity shows a significant negative indirect effect on persistence intentions through belonging, though weaker than expected — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
no-gender-differences-goal-congruity-indigenous |
title |
No significant gender differences in communal or agentic goal affordances, endorsements, or incongruity among Indigenous STEM students |
description |
No significant gender differences in communal or agentic goal affordances, endorsements, or incongruity among Indigenous STEM students |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
weak |
newest_evidence |
2025 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-24 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — yu-fanyi-2025 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.