A competency-based pressure ulcer curriculum improved competency scores across curriculum phases¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · reviewr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? In van Zuilen et al.'s mandatory competency-based curriculum for 645 medical students, competency scores improved from 17.3 after Phase 1 to 19.8 after Phase 3 (p < 0.001). → Reiter Manuel 2025
Evidence¶
Reiter Manuel 2025¶
Reiter Manuel, Busch Dorothee, Erfurt‐Berge Cornelia. (2025). Educational Interventions for Medical Students in Chronic Wound Care—A Scoping Review. International Wound Journal. https://doi.org/10.1111/iwj.70760
q2 · i? · review · r2
The review reports, from van Zuilen et al.'s four-year mandatory competency-based geriatric curriculum with 645 medical students, that "Competency scores improved from a Score of 17.3 after Phase 1 to 19.8 after Phase 3 (p < 0.001)"; every student achieved basic competency.
"Competency scores improved from a Score of 17.3 after Phase 1 to 19.8 after Phase 3 (p < 0.001)"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Medical students and interns poorly identified pressure ulcer risk in a patient-safety simulation — related
- Interprofessional teams identified pressure ulcer risks better than individuals in a simulation study — related
- Online and interprofessional wound care courses increased students' subjective knowledge and were well accepted — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.