Claims

Online and interprofessional wound care courses increased students' subjective knowledge and were well accepted

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · review r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Schlupeck et al.'s online case-based course and Bergendahl et al.'s interprofessional skills course both significantly increased students' subjective knowledge of wound care. → Reiter Manuel 2025 q2 i? Ma et al.'s online module produced significantly higher post-quiz scores, with every participant scoring higher after the module. → Reiter Manuel 2025 (2)

Evidence

Reiter Manuel 2025

Reiter Manuel, Busch Dorothee, Erfurt‐Berge Cornelia. (2025). Educational Interventions for Medical Students in Chronic Wound Care—A Scoping Review. International Wound Journal. https://doi.org/10.1111/iwj.70760

q2 · i? · review · r2

The review reports, from Schlupeck et al.'s voluntary 30–45-minute case-based online course for 323 medical students on venous leg ulcers, that subjective knowledge of ABI measurement and compression therapy "increased significantly after attending the course," with 86.1% finding it helpful.

"The subjective knowledge level for skills such as ABI Measurement and compression therapy increased significantly after attending the course. The course was very well accepted by the students with 86.1% finding the course helpful for their future as doctors. Students (69.4%) agreed that the online course was more educative than the traditional lecture"

Reiter Manuel 2025 (2)

Reiter Manuel, Busch Dorothee, Erfurt‐Berge Cornelia. (2025). Educational Interventions for Medical Students in Chronic Wound Care—A Scoping Review. International Wound Journal. https://doi.org/10.1111/iwj.70760

q2 · i? · review · r2

The review reports, from Ma et al.'s voluntary 30–60-minute online module with text, videos, charts and built-in quizzes for 33 medical and physician assistant students, that "every participant's post‐quiz scores were higher than pre‐test scores" and 99% found the course very or extremely useful.

"The pre‐ and post‐quiz analysis showed a significant higher average score after completing the online module. Throughout every participant's post‐quiz scores were higher than pre‐test scores. Participants have suggested that the course was very or extremely useful (total of 99%) for the learning experience."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.