Claims

Single composite accountability indicators are susceptible to gaming and Campbell's Law corruption pressures

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · theoretical r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · overdue for a recheck since 2020: tool and model accuracy changes quickly

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Because consequences attach to outcomes rather than behaviors, composite test-based indicators reinforce both desired improvement behaviors and undesired behaviors such as teaching to the test, curriculum narrowing, and cheating, so long as the outcome is the same. → Adams 2017

Evidence

Adams 2017

Adams, C. M., Ford, T. G., Forsyth, P. B., Ware, J. K., Olsen, J. J., Lepine, J. A., Sr., Barnes, L. B., Khojasteh, J., & Mwavita, M. (2017). Next generation accountability: A vision for improvement under ESSA. Palo Alto, CA: Learning Policy Institute. https://learningpolicyinstitute.org/product/next-generation-accountability

q2 · i? · theoretical · r2

The report's argumentative analysis of composite-indicator accountability systems cites prior research on gaming and test perversion (e.g., Booher-Jennings, 2005; Forte, 2010; Ho, 2008) and quotes Campbell's warning that quantitative social indicators used for decision making become subject to corruption pressures.

"Under test-based accountability, consequences and/or rewards are attached to outcomes, not behaviors. This is problematic because both desired behaviors (e.g., efforts to improve teaching practice) and undesired behaviors (teaching to the test, narrowing of the curriculum, cheating, etc.) are reinforced equally, so long as the outcome is the same"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id composite-indicators-gaming-campbells-law
title Single composite accountability indicators are susceptible to gaming and Campbell's Law corruption pressures
description Single composite accountability indicators are susceptible to gaming and Campbell's Law corruption pressures
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2017
recheck_by 2020
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-10
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — adams-2017

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.