Claims

Computerized educational packages produced statistically significant higher mathematics achievement than traditional teaching in eighth-grade classes in Ma'an

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Eighth-grade students taught with computerized educational packages scored significantly higher on the post exam than students taught by traditional method (experimental mean 27.444 vs control mean 24.955). → Salah 2016

Evidence

Salah 2016

Dr. Raed Omar Salah. (2016). Effectiveness of Using Computerized Educational Packages in Teaching Math Curriculum on the Learning of Student in Eighth Grade at Ma'an City. Journal of Education and Practice, Vol.7, No.12. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1099555

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Quasi-experimental two-way ANCOVA of post-exam scores for 109 eighth-grade students in two schools (one male, one female), with experimental groups taught via computerized packages and control groups taught traditionally for four weeks. The article reports "f calculated value is (51.97) at functional level (0.019)" in favor of the experimental groups.

"Table (4) explains that there are functional statis tical differences at level (α=0.05) refers to teach ing method where f calculated value is (51.97) at funct ional level (0.019)"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.