Eighth-standard students taught mathematics through cooperative learning achieved higher gain scores than control-group students taught by lecture method¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr1·q2
Currency · newest study 2012 · checked against its sources 2026-11-01 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Experimental-group students outperformed control-group students in gain scores, a statistically significant difference at the 5% level. → K. Thiyagu 2012
Evidence¶
K. Thiyagu 2012¶
K. Thiyagu. (2012). Effectiveness of Co-operative Learning Method in Learning of Mathematics among Eighth Standard Students. i-manager's Journal on Educational Psychology, Vol. 5 No. 4, February - April 2012. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1102329
q2 · i? · causal · r1
Two equivalent-group quasi-experiment with 20 students per group matched on pre-test scores; treatment was 60 minutes per day over fifteen days. Table 1 reports control mean 6.46 (SD 2.60) versus experimental mean 9.92 (SD 2.32), calculated t = 3.58, "*Significant" at the 5% level.
"It is inferred from the Table 1 that there is a significant difference between control and experimental group students in their gain scores. That is, the experimental group students are better than the control group students in their gain scores."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Cooperative learning produced significantly higher gain scores than lecture teaching for each of the knowledge, understanding and application objectives — possibly the same claim (merge candidate)
- The TGT group scored higher than the lecture-based control group on the mathematics posttest, a difference the authors call significant though they print only within-group pretest-posttest tests — related
- Grade VIII students taught mathematics with the TGT web-based game technique showed a significant pretest-to-posttest achievement gain over three weeks — related
- Class IX physical science students taught with the constructivist 7E model achieved significantly higher post-test and gain scores than students taught with traditional methods — related
- Junior secondary students taught algebraic expressions with card games and algebra tic-tacmatics achieved significantly higher adjusted post-test scores than students taught by conventional lecture method — related
- The control group showed no significant pre-test to post-test difference under conventional teaching — related
- Form two physics students taught through intensive practical activities significantly outperformed students taught by conventional lecture-based methods on a post-test of chosen topics — related
- Students taught with the Learning Together technique retained significantly more psychology knowledge on a delayed test than lecture-taught students — related
- Students taught with the Learning Together technique achieved significantly higher psychology posttest scores than students taught by lecture-based teaching — related
- Retention scores differed significantly between students taught with discussion and lecture methods — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.