Claims

Eighth-standard students taught mathematics through cooperative learning achieved higher gain scores than control-group students taught by lecture method

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2012 · checked against its sources 2026-11-01 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Experimental-group students outperformed control-group students in gain scores, a statistically significant difference at the 5% level. → K. Thiyagu 2012

Evidence

K. Thiyagu 2012

K. Thiyagu. (2012). Effectiveness of Co-operative Learning Method in Learning of Mathematics among Eighth Standard Students. i-manager's Journal on Educational Psychology, Vol. 5 No. 4, February - April 2012. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1102329

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Two equivalent-group quasi-experiment with 20 students per group matched on pre-test scores; treatment was 60 minutes per day over fifteen days. Table 1 reports control mean 6.46 (SD 2.60) versus experimental mean 9.92 (SD 2.32), calculated t = 3.58, "*Significant" at the 5% level.

"It is inferred from the Table 1 that there is a significant difference between control and experimental group students in their gain scores. That is, the experimental group students are better than the control group students in their gain scores."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.