Claims

Conflict orientation scores decreased significantly in both trained and untrained groups, so the decrease cannot be ascribed to the training

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q3
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Both the experimental group (3.93 to 3.60) and the control group (4.00 to 3.60) showed statistically significant decreases in conflict orientation after post-test. → Abel Gitimu Waithaka 2015

Evidence

Abel Gitimu Waithaka 2015

Abel Gitimu Waithaka, Shante' Moore-Austin, Priscilla N. Gitimu. (2015). Influence of conflict resolution training on conflict handling styles of college students. Research in Higher Education Journal, 28. http://www.aabri.com/copyright.html

q3 · i? · causal · r1

Paired samples t-test on conflict orientation totals with a one-week interval between pre- and post-testing; the experimental group mean decreased significantly from 3.93 to 3.60 and the control group mean from 4.00 to 3.60, with the article reporting "statistically significant difference in both experimental and control groups after the post-test."

"Since the decrease was in both experimental and control groups, then the decrease cannot be ascribed to the training."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.