Claims

Self-regulated jigsaw IV did not significantly increase students' attitudes towards the English course; the significant gain-score difference reflected a control-group decline

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? The experimental group's attitude increase was slight and statistically insignificant, and the significant attitude gain-score difference arose because control-group attitudes decreased. → Esin Özdemir 2016

Evidence

Esin Özdemir 2016

Esin Özdemir, Ali Arslan. (2016). The Effect of Self-regulated Jigsaw IV on University Students' Academic Achievements and Attitudes towards English Course. Journal of Education and Training Studies. http://dx.doi.org/10.11114/jets.v4i5.1453

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Independent samples t-test on attitude gain scores in the same quasi-experiment (t = -2.838, p = 0.008; experimental gain 5.00, control -6.84). Table 1 shows the experimental group's attitude increase was "slight and insignificant" (pre 80.40 to post 85.40, paired t p = 0.076).

"From the point of attitude gain scores; the significant difference between the means may seem as in favor of the experimental group, but the reason for this can be explained by the decrease in the control group students' attitude gain scores."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.