Claims

A constructivist, process-oriented syllabus was suggested to be more effective than a knowledge-based approach for cross-cultural learning (Wright, 2000, as reported)

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · design r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2001 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? A comparative study cited by the authors found that a syllabus emphasizing constructivist process-learning and intersubjectivity outperformed a knowledge-based culture-as-information curriculum. → Murray 2001

Evidence

Murray 2001

Murray, G. L., & Bollinger, D. J. (2001). Developing Cross-Cultural Awareness: Learning Through the Experiences of Others. TESL Canada Journal, 19(1). https://teslcanadajournal.ca doi:10.18806/tesl.v19i1.920

q2 · i? · design · r2

This is background literature reported second-hand: the review attributes the finding to Wright (2000), who compared a knowledge-based curriculum (control) with a constructivist treatment syllabus within the same course. The study's design is not described here in detail.

"The results of this study point to the need "to reconsider the paradigm of culture as information and introduce leamer-centred activities that arbitrate between student's pre-existing perceptions and the otherness of another culture" (Wright, 2000, p. 337)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id constructivist-syllabus-beats-knowledge-based-culture-teaching
title A constructivist, process-oriented syllabus was suggested to be more effective than a knowledge-based approach for cross-cultural learning (Wright, 2000, as reported)
description A constructivist, process-oriented syllabus was suggested to be more effective than a knowledge-based approach for cross-cultural learning (Wright, 2000, as reported)
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2001
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-09-26
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — murray-2001

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.