CVT's control–anxiety relation breaks down across latent emotional profiles, with unstandardized coefficients ranging from −0.292 to +0.024 including non-significant positive effects¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr3·q2
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? The most notable deviation from universality concerns Academic Control and Anxiety: its effect weakens and reverses direction across latent profiles relative to the full sample. → Dirk Tempelaar · Alexandra Niculescu 2026
Evidence¶
Dirk Tempelaar · Alexandra Niculescu 2026¶
Dirk Tempelaar · Alexandra Niculescu. (2026). Testing the Relative Universalism of Psychological Theories: A Person-Centered Analysis of Control-Value Theory. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-026-10155-2
q2 · i? · associational · r3
Mixture regression (SEM within latent profiles) of control-value relations. The article reports control–anxiety unstandardized coefficients falling "from − 0.686 in the full sample" to a range across profiles that includes non-significant positive effects, a directional reversal inconsistent with CVT.
"The most notable deviation from universality concerns the relation between Academic Control and Anxiety: unstandardized coefficients decrease from − 0.686 in the full sample (with similar values across demographic groups) to values ranging from − 0.292 to + 0.024 across profiles, including non-significant positive effects."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Nonlinear CVT extensions show cubic control terms with negative coefficients for negative emotions in the full sample, but the coefficient's sign differs across latent profiles — related
- Explained variance of CVT emotion models falls below 15% within latent profiles versus a median above 30% in grouping analyses, beyond what variance restriction explains — related
- Latent profile analysis of four learning-related achievement emotions yields a five-class solution: four academic-control gradient profiles plus a distinct high-boredom profile — a broader claim this one bears on
- In the HghLBO profile, boredom and enjoyment lose nearly all predictive power for persistence, though they predict persistence in full-sample and multigroup analyses — a broader claim this one bears on
- CVT structural relations are largely stable across gender and prior-education groupings, supporting relative universalism under variable-centered tests — related
- Students experience a rich diversity of academic emotions, with anxiety reported most often (15-25% of reports) but positive emotions described about as often as negative emotions — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
control-anxiety-relation-fails-across-profiles |
title |
CVT's control–anxiety relation breaks down across latent emotional profiles, with unstandardized coefficients ranging from −0.292 to +0.024 including non-significant positive effects |
description |
CVT's control–anxiety relation breaks down across latent emotional profiles, with unstandardized coefficients ranging from −0.292 to +0.024 including non-significant positive effects |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2026 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-22 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — dirk-tempelaar-alexandra-niculescu-2026 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.