Claims

The control group's involvement also improved significantly under the standard program, but only from extremely low to low level

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q3
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Control group children showed a statistically significant pre-test to post-test involvement increase, but remained at a low involvement level. → Akyol 2018

Evidence

Akyol 2018

Akyol, T., & Erkan, S. (2018). The effects of mosaic based approach on involvement levels of children. International Journal of Educational Methodology, 4(4), 303-309. https://doi.org/10.12973/ijem.4.4.303

q3 · i? · causal · r1

Wilcoxon Signed Rank test on the 26 control children: pre-test mean 1.97, post-test 2.42, z=-3.319, p=0.001 as printed in Table 4. The discussion states control involvement "increased from extremely low leve l to low level" while the experiment group reached medium-high.

"When Table 4 was analysed, “Leuven Involvement Scale for Young Children ” pre-test score average of control group children was 1.97, post-test score average was 2.42. There was statistically significant difference between pre -test, and post-test scores of control group [p<.05)]."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.