Claims

Within the experimental group, involvement rose from pre-test through post-test and was retained four weeks later

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? The experimental group's involvement scores increased significantly across pre-test, post-test, and retention test, with the retention test four weeks after post-test still higher than pre-test. → Akyol 2018

Evidence

Akyol 2018

Akyol, T., & Erkan, S. (2018). The effects of mosaic based approach on involvement levels of children. International Journal of Educational Methodology, 4(4), 303-309. https://doi.org/10.12973/ijem.4.4.303

q3 · i? · causal · r2

Friedman's Two-Way ANOVA on the 26 experimental children across three measurements: pre-test mean 1.93, post-test 3.19, retention 3.23, Chi Square 43.221, p=0.001, with multiple comparison differences between measurements 1-2 and 1-3 as printed in Table 3.

"There was statistically significant difference between pre -test, post -test, and retention test scores of experiment group [ p<.05)]. Post-test and retention test applied four weeks after post -test on experiment group that was applied mosaic approach based education program showed higher average scores compared to pre -test average scores."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.