Control-group students who received no intervention showed no improvements in reading fluency¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? The article reports that control students not exposed to any intervention showed no improvements, while experimental students' post-test mean rose from 1.68 to 2.44. → Ayed H. Ziadat & Mohammad Soud A. AL-Awan 2018

Evidence¶

Ayed H. Ziadat & Mohammad Soud A. AL-Awan 2018¶

Ayed H. Ziadat & Mohammad Soud A. AL-Awan. (2018). The Effectiveness of Neurological Impress Method on Reading Fluency of Students with Learning Disabilities in Amman, Jordan. International Education Studies, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v11n1p165

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Authors' statement in the Results and Discussion section about the no-treatment control group across the sixteen-week period. The control group's printed means were 1.79 (pre) and 1.84 (post); no statistical test of this within-group change is printed.

"this research provided clear evidence that the controlled group students who didn't receive the Neurological Impress Method and they were not exposed to any intervention showed no improvements"

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Control-group students showed no improvement in using ILP features while interpreting without instruction — related
• Both RT and regular remedial instruction significantly improved underachievers' oral reading fluency over 15 weeks — reports the opposite
• Students with learning disabilities trained with the Neurological Impress Method showed significantly greater post-test reading fluency than a no-treatment control group — related
• The control group following the regular Games and Physical Activities course showed no statistically significant pre-to-post change on any motor test — a broader claim this one bears on