Claims

The control group following the regular Games and Physical Activities course showed no statistically significant pre-to-post change on any motor test

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? For the control group, paired-samples t tests found the difference between pre-test and post-test averages insignificant (p>0.05) on all six motor performance tests. → Altinkok 2017

Evidence

Altinkok 2017

Altinkok, M. (2017). The Effect of Coordinated Teaching Method Practices on Some Motor Skills of 6-Year-Old Children. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 68, 49-61. https://doi.org/10.14689/ejer.2017.68.3

q3 · i? · causal · r2

Paired-samples t tests on the control group, which took the regular Games and Physical Activities course for 10 weeks, across the same six motor tests. The article reports the difference "was found to be insignificant (p>0.05)"; no effect size is printed, so equivalence was not tested.

"according to the pre- and post-test findings of “paired samples t” test of the control group, the difference between group averages was found to be insignificant (p>0.05)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.