Control-group students without the tolerance course showed essentially no change in tolerance over the academic year¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? Control-group tolerance measures changed within statistical margin of error (0.3%), contrasting with the experimental groups' gains. → Naumenko and Naumenko 2016

Evidence¶

Naumenko and Naumenko 2016¶

Evgeny A. Naumenko, Olga N. Naumenko. (2016). Pedagogical Experience on Formation of Tolerant and Multicultural Consciousness of Students. European Journal of Contemporary Education. https://doi.org/10.13187/ejced.2016.17.335

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Control groups of students of other specialties (30, 31, and 29 students across 2010–2013) received no course «Religions of the region under study». Average tolerance moved from 73.5 to 73.8, which the article describes as "within a statistical margin of error"; no test statistic is printed.

"The measures of changing tolerance and multicultural components in consciousness of the control group students changed within a statistical margin of error – 0, 3 %."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• A compulsory specialized course on religions of the region increased students' confessional tolerance over a four-year teaching experiment — related
• Experimental-group students improved on all four measured prosocial-tolerance qualities, with the largest gain in courage in upholding position (~20%) and the smallest in independence (~10%) — related
• A daily learning diary alone (Group D) did not produce statistically significant pre-post gains on any measured outcome in an online mathematics preparation course — related