A compulsory specialized course on religions of the region increased students' confessional tolerance over a four-year teaching experiment¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr1·q2
Currency · newest study 2016 · checked against its sources 2026-11-03 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Students in the experimental groups showed an average increase of 18.5% in tolerant consciousness across academic years on the self-report questionnaire (average 78.0% before to 96.5% after, Table 3); expert ratings were reported separately as showing positive dynamics, with no percentage change given. → Naumenko and Naumenko 2016
Evidence¶
Naumenko and Naumenko 2016¶
Evgeny A. Naumenko, Olga N. Naumenko. (2016). Pedagogical Experience on Formation of Tolerant and Multicultural Consciousness of Students. European Journal of Contemporary Education. https://doi.org/10.13187/ejced.2016.17.335
q2 · i? · causal · r1
Four-year teaching experiment with 73 students aged 17–20 in experimental groups, assessed by a 50-item questionnaire and two independent expert groups on a 10-point scale. The article reports "an average change in the development of tolerant component in consciousness" of 18.5% per academic year; no effect size or significance test statistic is printed.
"An average change in the development of tolerant component in consciousness in the academic year was defined by quantitative measures – 18, 5 %."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Students aged 17–19 were the most susceptible to the formation of confessional tolerance in the experiment — related
- Control-group students without the tolerance course showed essentially no change in tolerance over the academic year — related
- Embedding tolerance methodology incidentally in a non-confessional discipline failed when Muslims reached 50% of the group — related
- The proportion of experimental-group students at a high tolerance level increased by 165% during the formative experiment — related
- An interactive-methods scheme for forming social tolerance raised the tolerance index of future teachers by 34% in the experimental group versus 5% in the control group — related
- The experimental group's conflict level increased by 6.4 points (20%), which the authors interpret as greater readiness to resist asocial actions rather than heightened interpersonal conflict — related
- The course approach was ineffective for students with a high level of religious addiction, including two students with radical Islam — related
- Experimental-group students improved on all four measured prosocial-tolerance qualities, with the largest gain in courage in upholding position (~20%) and the smallest in independence (~10%) — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.