Claims

Control groups taught conventionally showed no significant pre-to-post gain in English grammar achievement in Shri Vani Vilas Middle School

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2014 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? There was no significant difference between pre-test and post-test mean scores of the control group in Shri Vani Vilas Middle School. → Singaravelu 2014

Evidence

Singaravelu 2014

Singaravelu, G. (2014). Impact of Gadget Based Learning of Grammar in English at Standard II. i-manager's Journal of English Language Teaching, Vol. 4, No. 2, April-June. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1068432

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Finding 2 of the equivalent-group experiment: the 40-student control group in Shri Vani Vilas Middle School showed no significant pre-post difference under conventional teaching. The author concludes conventional teaching "is not effective in learning English Grammar at standard II".

"There is no significant difference in the achieved mean score between pre test of control group and post test of control group in learning English Grammar of the students of standard II in Shri Vani Vilas Middle School."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.