Claims

Gadget Based Learning is more effective than conventional method in learning English grammar at standard II in both an aided and a government school

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2014 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Experimental groups taught with the gadget showed significantly higher post-test achievement than control groups taught conventionally in both schools. → Singaravelu 2014

Evidence

Singaravelu 2014

Singaravelu, G. (2014). Impact of Gadget Based Learning of Grammar in English at Standard II. i-manager's Journal of English Language Teaching, Vol. 4, No. 2, April-June. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1068432

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Equivalent-group experiment in two Mannargudi schools (40 experimental and 40 control students each). Table 2 reports experimental pre-test means of 9.58 and 13.65 rising to post-test means of 19.65 and 19.86, which the author reads as the gadget being "more effective than conventional method".

"Gadget Based Learning is more effective than conventional method in learning English Grammar at standard II in both types of schools through mean score of pre test of Experimental group in two schools respectively 9.58,13.65"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.