Claims

The content of coordination programs that most effectively improves agility remains unclear

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q1
Currency · newest study 2012 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q1 i? The authors state that although increased fitness scores suggest the coordination exercise program is effective, it is not clear which method or activity produces the most effective intervention. → Yasumitsu et al. 2012

Evidence

Yasumitsu et al. 2012

Tatsuo Yasumitsu, Haruo Nogawa, Yoshiro Hatano. (2012). Effects of the Coordination Exercise Program on School Children's Agility: Short-Time Program during School Recess. Journal of Research, volume 6, issue 2. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ954491

q1 · i? · causal · r2

Authors' interpretation in the discussion, offered without new data: they call for "a comparative validation and analysis of each type of coordination exercise program" to identify the most efficient program.

"But in terms of the content of programs, it is not clear which method or activity could produce the most effective intervention. What is needed for further consideration is a comparative validation and analysis of each type of coordination exercise program and an investigation into creating the most efficient program."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.