Claims

A 10-week coordination-based teaching program produced statistically significant pre-to-post gains on all six measured motor skills in 6-year-olds

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? The experimental group showed a statistically significant pre-test to post-test difference (p<0.001) on agility, swiftness, tennis ball tossing, ball control by foot, throwing a ball into the ring, and footrace coordination, in favour of the post-tests. → Altinkok 2017

Evidence

Altinkok 2017

Altinkok, M. (2017). The Effect of Coordinated Teaching Method Practices on Some Motor Skills of 6-Year-Old Children. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 68, 49-61. https://doi.org/10.14689/ejer.2017.68.3

q3 · i? · causal · r2

Paired-samples t tests on the experimental group (n=30 per the table rows) across six motor performance tests after a 10-week coordination-based program. The article reports "a statistically significant difference was found (p<0.001)" in favour of post-tests; no effect sizes are printed.

"according to the pre- and post-test findings of “paired samples t” test of the experimental group, a statistically significant difference was found (p<0.001). The differences in question showed up in favour of the post-tests."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.