Claims

At post-test the experimental group significantly outperformed the control group on all six motor tests, at significance levels varying from p<0.05 to p<0.001

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Independent t tests on post-test values showed statistically significant differences between the experimental and control groups in favour of the experimental group, at the .001 level for Agility, Controlling the Ball by Foot, and Footrace Coordination, the .01 level for Tossing a Tennis Ball, and the .05 level for Throwing a Ball into the Ring. → Altinkok 2017

Evidence

Altinkok 2017

Altinkok, M. (2017). The Effect of Coordinated Teaching Method Practices on Some Motor Skills of 6-Year-Old Children. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 68, 49-61. https://doi.org/10.14689/ejer.2017.68.3

q3 · i? · causal · r2

Independent-samples t tests comparing post-test means of the experimental (n=30) and control (n=30) groups on six motor tests. The article reports significant differences "in favour of the experimental group" at .001, .01, and .05 levels; no effect sizes are printed.

"among the post-test values of the “independent t” test of the experimental and control groups, a statistically significant difference on the level of .001 (p<0.001) was found among the mean test values of Agility, Controlling the Ball by Foot, and Footrace Coordination"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.