Claims

The corpus-tool production advantage is bounded: findings are limited to verb-noun collocations in one Turkish ELT setting

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? The authors state the study's results may not generalize beyond verb-noun collocations, beyond the single ELT department setting, and beyond participants of similar proficiency. → Kartal and Yangineksi 2018

Evidence

Kartal and Yangineksi 2018

Galip Kartal, Gonca Yangin Eksi. (2018). The Effects of Using Corpus Tools on EFL Student Teachers' Learning and Production of Verb-Noun Collocations. PASAA, Vol. 55. https://so04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/pasaa

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Authors' stated limitations: the study was conducted in one setting (an ELT department of a state university in Turkey) with a limited number of participants; participants' computer and Internet capabilities might have affected ease of corpus use; only verb-noun collocations were studied.

"this study dealt with only verb-noun collocations. The results may not apply to other types of collocations (e.g. adjective-noun, noun-noun, and verb-adverb collocations)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.