Claims

Corpus-tool instruction produces no statistically significant advantage over traditional instruction on EFL student teachers' verb-noun collocation knowledge

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Controlling for pre-test scores, experimental (corpus) and control (traditional) groups did not differ significantly on adjusted Collocation Knowledge Test post-test mean scores. → Kartal and Yangineksi 2018

Evidence

Kartal and Yangineksi 2018

Galip Kartal, Gonca Yangin Eksi. (2018). The Effects of Using Corpus Tools on EFL Student Teachers' Learning and Production of Verb-Noun Collocations. PASAA, Vol. 55. https://so04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/pasaa

q2 · i? · causal · r2

One-way ANCOVA on CKT post-test scores with pre-test as covariate in a pre/post quasi-experiment with two intact classes of first-year ELT student teachers in Turkey. Table 2 reports Group F = 2.294, Sig. = .135. The null was not an equivalence test.

"controlling for the pre -test mean scores of CKT, there was not a statistically significant difference between control and experimental groups regarding adjusted CKT mean scores."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.