Claims

The experimental group's collocation scores improved significantly from pretest to posttest after corpus-based instruction

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? A paired-samples t-test found a statistically significant pretest-to-posttest improvement in the experimental group taught with corpus-based concordancing activities (t(14)=-4.481, p<.005), with means rising from 31.87 to 65.93. → Uçar 2015

Evidence

Uçar 2015

Uçar, S., & Yükselir, C. (2015). The Effect of Corpus-based Activities on Verb-Noun Collocations in EFL Classes. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology – April 2015, volume 14 issue 2. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1057374

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Paired-samples t-test within the 15-student experimental group receiving corpus-based instruction using COCA concordance lines. Scores rose from pretest M=31.87 (SD=13.352) to posttest M=65.93 (SD=20.126), a statistically significant gain (t(14)=-4.481, p<.005).

"the findings ind icated that there is a statistically significant difference between pre-test (M= 31.87, SD= 65.93) and post-test ( M=65.93, SD=20.126) scores of experimental group with regard to collocation test scores. ( t (14)= -4.481, p<.005)"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.