Correctness Confidence did not significantly predict recall accuracy, contrary to the authors' hypothesis¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr2·q3
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? Correctness Confidence showed no significant effect on test recall accuracy in the GLMM analysis. → Xiaoyun Chen 2024
Evidence¶
Xiaoyun Chen 2024¶
Xiaoyun Chen, Katherine E. Twomey, Miranda Hayes, Gert Westermann. (2024). The limits of curiosity? New evidence for the roles of metacognitive abilities and curiosity in learning. Metacognition and Learning. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-024-09407-9
q3 · i? · associational · r2
Same binomial GLMM on 4010 incorrect-guess trials from 100 adults; the article reports "Correctness Confidence did not have a significant impact on test recall accuracy (β(logit) = 0.03, SE = 0.06, z = 0.58, p =.56)", different from the authors' hypotheses. No effect size printed.
"Correctness Confidence did not have a significant impact on test recall accuracy (β(logit) = 0.03, SE = 0.06, z = 0.58, p =.56)"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Academic self-efficacy was not significantly associated with final test performance — related
- The Not Sure state of Knowledge Confidence predicts better recall of object names, consistent with the region of proximal learning framework — related
- Curiosity did not significantly predict recall accuracy in the blurred-picture learning task — related
- Correctness Confidence linearly predicts curiosity, with higher confidence in a guess associated with greater curiosity — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
correctness-confidence-did-not-predict-recall |
title |
Correctness Confidence did not significantly predict recall accuracy, contrary to the authors' hypothesis |
description |
Correctness Confidence did not significantly predict recall accuracy, contrary to the authors' hypothesis |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2024 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-19 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — xiaoyun-chen-2024 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.