Correctness Confidence linearly predicts curiosity, with higher confidence in a guess associated with greater curiosity¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr2·q3
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? Correctness Confidence had a significant positive linear effect on curiosity ratings in the blurred-picture experiment. → Xiaoyun Chen 2024
Evidence¶
Xiaoyun Chen 2024¶
Xiaoyun Chen, Katherine E. Twomey, Miranda Hayes, Gert Westermann. (2024). The limits of curiosity? New evidence for the roles of metacognitive abilities and curiosity in learning. Metacognition and Learning. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-024-09407-9
q3 · i? · associational · r2
Same linear mixed-effects model of curiosity ratings from 100 adults across 6000 trials; the article reports Correctness Confidence "had a significant effect on curiosity ( β = 0.05, SE = 0.01, p <.001), suggesting a linear relationship", depicted in Fig. 5.
"Correctness Confidence also had a significant effect on curiosity ( β = 0.05, SE = 0.01, p <.001), suggesting a linear relationship."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Curiosity did not significantly predict recall accuracy in the blurred-picture learning task
- The Not Sure state of Knowledge Confidence predicts better recall of object names, consistent with the region of proximal learning framework — related
- Low and medium Knowledge Confidence heighten curiosity, contradicting the predicted inverted U-shaped relationship — reports the opposite
- Correctness Confidence did not significantly predict recall accuracy, contrary to the authors' hypothesis — related
- Curiosity ratings are functionally distinct from subjective uncertainty ratings: uncertainty declines near-linearly with confidence while curiosity is inverted-U shaped — reports the opposite
- Without feedback, people are more curious about high-confidence errors than about equally high-confidence correct answers, replicated across experiments — related
- Yes/no feedback that participants were correct nearly quenched curiosity for correct answers, whereas without feedback curiosity peaked at moderate-to-high confidence — related
- Partial resolution of curiosity through immediate feedback increases subsequent curiosity — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
correctness-confidence-linearly-predicts-curiosity |
title |
Correctness Confidence linearly predicts curiosity, with higher confidence in a guess associated with greater curiosity |
description |
Correctness Confidence linearly predicts curiosity, with higher confidence in a guess associated with greater curiosity |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2024 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-19 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — xiaoyun-chen-2024 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.