Claims

Partial resolution of curiosity through immediate feedback increases subsequent curiosity

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2019 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Immediate corrective feedback after predictions produced greater curiosity than delayed feedback, consistent with the approach gradient. → Shin 2019

Evidence

Shin 2019

Shin, D. D., & Kim, S. (2019). Homo Curious: Curious or Interested? Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09497-x

q2 · i? · review · r2

The review reports, citing Loewenstein and colleagues (1992, cited in Loewenstein 1994), a study giving corrective feedback either immediately after each prediction or after all guesses; immediate feedback intensified curiosity, aligning with the approach gradient.

"The partial resolution of curiosity through immediate feedback led to greater curiosity than delayed feedback."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id immediate-feedback-partial-resolution-increases-curiosity
title Partial resolution of curiosity through immediate feedback increases subsequent curiosity
description Partial resolution of curiosity through immediate feedback increases subsequent curiosity
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2019
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-21
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — shin-2019

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.