During COVID, a third-grade volume-of-reading strategy showed greater reading growth than a control group without the strategy¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · qualitativer1·q2
Currency · newest study 2021 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Third graders asked to independently read two tailored articles per week demonstrated greater reading growth than a control group. → Bugler 2021
Evidence¶
Bugler 2021¶
Bugler, D. (2021). School District Collaboration: Lessons From Districts Participating in California Education Partners' California Language & Learning Initiative (CALLI). WestEd. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED616075
q2 · i? · qualitative · r1
An interview-reported district case during COVID distance learning: teachers chose reading volume as a manageable, data-friendly strategy. The article reports "greater growth in reading compared to a control group" but prints no effect size or test statistic.
"They decided to ask third graders to independently read two articles per week using the district's online system that tailors texts to students' reading levels. These students demonstrated greater growth in reading compared to a control group with whom this strategy was not used."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Four remedial reading interventions combined improved phonemic decoding, word reading accuracy and fluency, and reading comprehension for third-grade struggling readers one year after the interventions ended, though not on all measures — related
- Assignment to BookNook tutoring produces a small but statistically significant increase in reading growth on the NWEA MAP for grade 1-4 students — related
- Istation use is associated with significantly greater NWEA MAP Reading growth than comparison students in a South Carolina district (ES +0.06) — related
- Two years of multicomponent fluency intervention produced greater word-reading and fluency growth than one year or control, with no comprehension differences — related
- The interventions narrowed some reading gaps, reducing the Word Attack gap by about two-thirds for third graders and one-half for fifth graders — related
- Achievement declines from 2019 to 2022 were smaller for Asian American and White first and second graders than for Hispanic, Black, and AIAN students — related
- Only the discussion of the Flex vs. Plain phonics trial reports that, for students with full week-6 attendance, Flex showed greater gains than Plain on taught-letter alphabetics, decoding, and word reading; its results report no treatment differences or interactions — related
- Repeated listening improves oral reading fluency in second-grade students, with Listening Only outgaining Reading While Listening and Reading Only — related
- The strategy intervention improved third graders' adaptive use of strategies relative to untreated classmates — related
- A struggling fifth-grade reader with ADHD gained one full grade level in reading over six weeks of iPad-mediated tutoring — related
- Adequate-dose tutoring showed marginally significant effects for third graders on the NWEA MAP (ES = +0.27) — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
covid-volume-reading-growth-over-control |
title |
During COVID, a third-grade volume-of-reading strategy showed greater reading growth than a control group without the strategy |
description |
During COVID, a third-grade volume-of-reading strategy showed greater reading growth than a control group without the strategy |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
weak |
newest_evidence |
2021 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-09 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — bugler-2021 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.