CPS sections showed larger pre-posttest gains than the control group despite lower pretest preparedness¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr1·q2
Currency · newest study 2013 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? All experimental sections' posttest averages exceeded the control group's, with percentage increases of 97.36, 96.20, 77.10, and 81.74 versus 74.74 for the control group. → Termos 2013
Evidence¶
Termos 2013¶
Termos, M. H. (2013). The Effects of the Classroom Performance System on Student Participation, Attendance, and Achievement. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 25(1), 66-78. http://www.isetl.org/ijtlhe/
q2 · i? · causal · r1
Pre/posttest analysis using 10 copyrighted questions developed by biology faculty, administered at the beginning and end of the semester (115 experimental and 24 control students took the pretest). The control group started with the second-highest pretest average, yet every CPS section showed a larger percentage increase on the posttest.
"However, all experimental sections’ averages on the posttest were higher than that of the control group that had 74.74% increase even though the score average on the pretest was the second highest!"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- The experimental group's average achievement enhancement (28.14 points) exceeded the control group's (19.27 points) despite a lower pre-test mean — related
- Across all four measured HOTS skills, the experimental group's posttest means exceeded the control group's, and pretest-posttest values were significantly linear — related
- Both groups improved from pre-test to post-test on both topic tests, with the experimental group's Test 2 post-test mean exceeding the control group's — related
- Both groups improved from pretest to posttest at the individual level, with the article attributing the experimental group's larger gains to the etudes — related
- In the 2010 posttest the experimental group averaged 57.72% versus 44.41% in the control group (N=70 each) — related
- Overall, the experimental group's posttest average was significantly higher than the control group's despite both groups declining from pretest to posttest. — related
- Active learning students outperformed traditional-instruction students on each of the 14 individual writing and research skills, with an average 10.5-point higher score — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.