Claims

In the 2010 posttest the experimental group averaged 57.72% versus 44.41% in the control group (N=70 each)

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2014 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? The experimental group's mean posttest success (57.72%) exceeded the control group's (44.41%) in 2010. → Krišťák 2014

Evidence

Krišťák 2014

Krišťák, Ľ., Němec, M., Danihelová, Z. (2014). Interactive Methods of Teaching Physics at Technical Universities. Informatics in Education, 13(1), 51–71. https://doi.org/10.15388/infedu.2014.03

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Test successfulness histogram for the 2010 control and experimental groups (Fig. 1), each with N=70; the printed means, standard deviations and ranges are descriptive statistics reported with the figure.

"control group: N=70, Mean = 44.41%, Stand. Dev. = 22.73%, Max = 82%, Min = 2%, experimental group: N =70, Mean = 57.72%, Stand. Dev. 22.03%, Max = 94%, Min = 1%"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.