Claims

Senior secondary students taught with CRAIS achieved significantly higher mathematics posttest scores than students taught with modified conventional teaching strategy

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2015 · checked against its sources 2026-11-01 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Treatment with CRAIS produced a statistically significant main effect on students' achievement in mathematics compared with modified conventional teaching strategy. → Sabainah Oyebola Akinoso 2015

Evidence

Sabainah Oyebola Akinoso 2015

Sabainah Oyebola Akinoso. (2015). Teaching Mathematics in a Volatile, Uncertain, Complex and Ambiguous (VUCA) World: The Use of Concrete – Representational – Abstract Instructional Strategy. JISTE Vol. 19, No. 1, 2015. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1177074

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Pretest-posttest, control group, quasi-experimental study of 191 SS II students in four public schools in Ibadan, analysed by ANCOVA. The CRAIS group's adjusted posttest mean was 21.32 versus 19.07 for the control, and "treatment has significant effect on students’ achievement in mathematics".

"From Table 2, treatment has significant effect on students’ achievement in mathematics (F (1, 190) = 3.31; p< .05). Hypothesis 1 is, therefore, not rejected."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.