Claims

The authors interpret the drama method's effects through active, constructivist learning in which learners reconstruct and give new meanings to knowledge

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q1
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q1 i? The effectiveness of creative drama is explained as parallel to the cognitive learning approach, in which learning is an active rather than passive process. → Kaf 2017

Evidence

Kaf 2017

Kaf, O., & Uygungul Yilmaz, O. (2017). Effects of creative drama method on students’ attitude towards social studies, academic achievement and retention in Turkey. European Journal of Educational Research, 6(3), 289-298. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.6.3.289

q1 · i? · causal · r1

Authors' theoretical interpretation offered in the discussion, not a separately tested result; they frame drama's effects as consistent with "the cognitive learning approach" and constructivism. No additional evidence or argument is printed for this framing.

"considered within the framework of c onstructivism at the roots of 2005 curriculum, the effectiveness of the creative drama method is in parallel with the cognitive learning approach, which states that the learning takes place in an active process not in a passive one."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.