Claims

The authors interpret web-based virtual simulation as shifting the pilgrimage lesson from teacher-centred to student-centred learning consistent with constructivist learning theory

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q1
Currency · newest study 2013 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q1 i? The authors state that using web-based virtual simulation makes the teaching and learning process student-centred rather than teacher-centred, requiring students to think, analyze situations and think critically. → Ziden and Rahman 2013

Evidence

Ziden and Rahman 2013

Azidah Abu Ziden, Muhammad Faizal Abdul Rahman. (2013). The Effectiveness of Web-Based Multimedia Applications Simulation in Teaching and Learning. International Journal of Instruction, 6(2). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1085400

q1 · i? · causal · r1

This is the authors' interpretation in the Discussion section, not a separately measured outcome; the article offers no test of student-centredness or critical thinking. It is offered as an explanation of why the simulation supported learning.

"By using the web-based virtual simulation, the teaching and learning process is no longer teacher centered but is a student-centered. In this simulation process they are required to think, analyze situations and think critically on how to resolve the problem."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.