Claims

Effect sizes across creative drama studies in Social Studies are highly heterogeneous (Q = 90.019, p < .05; I² = 78.893%)

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2020 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? The studies included in the meta-analysis showed a statistically significant heterogeneous distribution of effect sizes, with I² indicating high heterogeneity. → Hafize Er-Türküresin 2020

Evidence

Hafize Er-Türküresin 2020

Hafize Er-Türküresin. (2020). The effect of using creative drama method on student achievement in the social studies course: A meta-analysis study. International Online Journal of Education and Teaching (IOJET), 7(4), 1881-1896. http://iojet.org/index.php/IOJET/article/view/1056

q3 · i? · quant-synthesis · r2

Heterogeneity testing within the same meta-analysis of 19 studies, using Q and I² statistics under fixed and random effects models. The article reports Q = 90.019, p < .05, and describes the I² value as indicating "a high level of heterogeneity with 78,893%".

"In terms of the random effect model, 𝐼2 value for 1,171 effect size value indicates a high level of heterogeneity with 78,893%."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.