The effect sizes of drama-based social studies instruction are highly heterogeneous across studies¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesisr2·q3
Currency · newest study 2022 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? The Q test was significant and the I² statistic indicated high heterogeneity (78.695%) among the included effect sizes, justifying the random effects model. → Yildirim 2022
Evidence¶
Yildirim 2022¶
Yildirim, E., Tikman, F., & Senturk, M. (2022). Meta-analysis on the effectiveness of using the drama approach in social studies course. International Journal on Social and Education Sciences (IJonSES), 4(1), 17-33. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijonses.301
q3 · i? · quant-synthesis · r2
Homogeneity analysis of the 38 effect sizes in the meta-analysis. The Q test was significant (Q=173.666; p<.05) and the I² value of 78.695% was interpreted as "a high level of heterogeneity", which the authors state justified using the random effects model.
"A statistical significance was found between the groups in terms of homogeneity test results (Q=173.666; p<.05), indicating that the effect size range was heterogeneous."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Effect sizes across creative drama studies in Social Studies are highly heterogeneous (Q = 90.019, p < .05; I² = 78.893%) — possibly the same claim (merge candidate)
- The effect of drama on social studies achievement does not differ significantly by duration of application (1–4 vs 5–10 weeks) — related
- The effect of drama on social studies achievement does not differ significantly by grade level (grades 4–7) — related
- The effect of drama on social studies achievement does not differ significantly by sample size, though effect sizes decrease slightly as sample size increases — related
- Effect sizes across primary studies are highly heterogeneous (Q = 283.659, I² = 77%), justifying the random-effects model — related
- Effect sizes across included studies were heterogeneous (Q=13.886, p<.05), and the article concludes a random-effects model is appropriate — related
- Effect sizes across the 31 included studies are highly heterogeneous (I² = 81.957%), warranting a random effects model — related
- Effect sizes of small-group learning studies in engineering and technology education are significantly heterogeneous, justifying moderator analyses — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
- Effect sizes across the 38 comparisons are highly heterogeneous, requiring a random-effects model — related
- Effect sizes of creative drama studies are heterogeneous (Q = 60.78, df = 39, p < .05), motivating moderator analyses — related
- Effect sizes do not differ significantly between selected-student and whole-class applications, with class-based applications slightly higher (g = 1.253 vs 1.245) — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.