Claims

The effect sizes of drama-based social studies instruction are highly heterogeneous across studies

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2022 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? The Q test was significant and the I² statistic indicated high heterogeneity (78.695%) among the included effect sizes, justifying the random effects model. → Yildirim 2022

Evidence

Yildirim 2022

Yildirim, E., Tikman, F., & Senturk, M. (2022). Meta-analysis on the effectiveness of using the drama approach in social studies course. International Journal on Social and Education Sciences (IJonSES), 4(1), 17-33. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijonses.301

q3 · i? · quant-synthesis · r2

Homogeneity analysis of the 38 effect sizes in the meta-analysis. The Q test was significant (Q=173.666; p<.05) and the I² value of 78.695% was interpreted as "a high level of heterogeneity", which the authors state justified using the random effects model.

"A statistical significance was found between the groups in terms of homogeneity test results (Q=173.666; p<.05), indicating that the effect size range was heterogeneous."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.